Delivered-To: ennael1@gmail.com Received: by 10.76.82.164 with SMTP id j4csp12904oay; Fri, 18 May 2012 06:09:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.180.91.225 with SMTP id ch1mr1465758wib.18.1337346587858; Fri, 18 May 2012 06:09:47 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from alamut.mageia.org (alamut.mageia.org. [212.85.158.146]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id gg1si595615wib.43.2012.05.18.06.09.47; Fri, 18 May 2012 06:09:47 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of board-private-owner@ml.mageia.org designates 212.85.158.146 as permitted sender) client-ip=212.85.158.146; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of board-private-owner@ml.mageia.org designates 212.85.158.146 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=board-private-owner@ml.mageia.org; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Received: by alamut.mageia.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id 2475744748; Fri, 18 May 2012 15:09:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alamut.mageia.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7175B44712 for ; Fri, 18 May 2012 15:09:41 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mageia.org Authentication-Results: alamut.mageia.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Received: from alamut.mageia.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (alamut.mageia.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10025) with ESMTP id m4-oKsNAloLY for ; Fri, 18 May 2012 15:09:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-wi0-f175.google.com (mail-wi0-f175.google.com [209.85.212.175]) by alamut.mageia.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF76C445DF for ; Fri, 18 May 2012 15:09:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: by wibhn6 with SMTP id hn6so127209wib.16 for ; Fri, 18 May 2012 06:09:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=3svOrhpt3p4xLKngiijbl/+LBu3ALICl2bgEvx4Odd0=; b=ipYqJU3Zt+If2cRl7PdYBdmqS+J3prpk8pE4VgIkj7RnQRsw2hyTIbV/Z4d8w+MrtP asLIpgt2+9mN+Yvr1/xKi7A6cy6+ZSjbqHJEIMHxAoLRI9YMNL2rIwcy/ncJ/39K4HW3 fuu5xe3ie6kgDXTubnzaSz/ETVaITznMjhgPLA7rIdmlbTElp5Vv510swC8gc8efZN+E 2Ih1F+ynNFCWjekbPUyOuFQtXaSi51vvBvNYGD+AXVTG/XHUrIxwC9MuWBypmxmrWEsE VmB0s25bNTTImzNrcZQ/e9h9tSpsk0SysMeJI05dg2zqxyw9W2YhBwBbrqf+y8djqw8j JmiQ== Received: by 10.216.144.199 with SMTP id n49mr7521638wej.25.1337346580276; Fri, 18 May 2012 06:09:40 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.13.143 with HTTP; Fri, 18 May 2012 06:09:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: "Romain d'Alverny" Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 15:09:09 +0200 Message-ID: To: board-private@ml.mageia.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [board-private] mandriva, foundation, business server X-Loop: board-private@ml.mageia.org X-Sequence: 50 Errors-to: board-private-owner@ml.mageia.org Precedence: list Precedence: bulk Sender: board-private-request@ml.mageia.org X-no-archive: yes List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: cc:board-private :-p On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 2:05 PM, Oliver Burger wrote: > 2012/5/18 Romain d'Alverny : >> =A0* until now, all this has been kept private in board-private: a) >> knowledge and decision about the foundation, and b) business server >> thing. Note that about a), people may question both the decision and >> the fact that it was private, without consulting the Council. We will >> mail privately Council members to inform them about both a) and b), >> but still. We won't need further arguments than what we explained to >> Mandriva, and what the governance says. But still again. In the case >> of things getting really ugly in the coming weeks, I'd suggest that we >> call for a vote of confidence to make things very clear (from Council, >> or from all registered contributors in LDAP). > > I'd call for a vote of confidence from Council, but as I think, our > arguments are logical and for the best of the project I do not expect > any flames in the teams. > Perhaps there will be some discussions in the forums, though and we > should react professionally and neutraly there. I know, that's partly > not my line of doing things, but I'll try. > > I expect the wider OpenSource community to respect our decision and > even applaude it. In my eyes, this shows our independence and at least > the people I know, (Chris Wickert from Fedora (FamsCo chair) and > Pascal (can't remember the surname from openSUSE and FOSDEM > organization) and others will see it my way. > So we can weather any immediate storms, trolling in our forums and Mdv > forums and on some blog sites, we can live with. > > So, go ahead! > > Oliver